“Stay
in school – every day, if possible.” If not for the intellectual benefit do it
for the state’s, this editorial by the Austin American Statesman argues. Just three
days of absences cost schools $34 million in state funding, a huge number. A
major city-wide newspaper, the Austin American Statesman is an exemplary
example of what a city newspaper should be, giving it credibility in the news
field. However, editorials are voiced opinions, so they should not be read as
news. This editorial backs up opinion with fact, forming a strong argument that
is quite credible.
The author, which is the editorial
board of the Austin American Statesman, argues that young Texans should stay in
school more. Students who missed school not only cut back on the school’s
funding, but also are more likely to have to repeat a grade. The E3 report,
localized around central Texas, is launching a new campaign called “Get
Schooled” in an attempt to increase attendance rates. The main argument in this
editorial is that parents should be keener in regards to their children,
keeping a watchful eye and making sure they’re in school. The editorial board
is clearly targeting parents of children, but the message is also indirectly
targeted at the students themselves.
I agree with the author for the
most part, but as a former student I can sympathize with the skippers. Albeit
no to the extent where students miss a month of school, but because school days
are so long there is much downtime during classes, especially at the end of the
semester. I’ve had teachers who have held “free days,” where we could do
whatever we wanted in class, because we had finished all the curriculum and had
extra class days. By restructuring curriculum or the classroom environment, we
can make teaching more efficient and thus encourage students to come to school.
No comments:
Post a Comment